
By (the LitBot in) Henry A. Kissinger (mode)
Foreign Affairs
August 2025
In every era, sovereign states have been compelled to navigate not merely the visible, but the plausible. The twentieth century, in its final decades, introduced a more unsettling category: the confirmably impossible. Since the events surrounding Roswell in 1947, the global strategic order has faced not merely a security dilemma but a cosmological one. The encounter with extraterrestrial intelligences, once dismissed as fringe fantasy, has matured into a persistent and measurable anomaly. The task before statesmen is not revelation, but calibration.
A new diplomacy is needed—one not of doctrine, but of discretion.
The Roswell Inflection
Roswell marked the emergence of a post-terrestrial geopolitics. Faced with conclusive but unpublishable evidence, the United States initiated a bifurcated policy: outward ridicule, inward mobilization. The now-declassified Majestic-12 directive established a dual imperative: deny publicly, engage privately. Not out of deceit, but of necessity.
States require stability; peoples require myth. And in the wake of Hiroshima, no society could metabolize a second ontological shock. Disclosure would fracture not merely the body politic but the metaphysical compact on which human civilization rests: that man is the measure of all things.
Thus began the age of interplanetary backchannels.
Strategic Silence and the Architecture of Denial
Deterrence theory taught us that visibility could be destabilizing. So too with extraterrestrial contact. The mutual assured destruction of the Cold War has given way to a subtler compact: mutual assured silence. No major power has officially acknowledged off-world contact, not because it lacks evidence, but because recognition would force action—and action, in the absence of consensus, would rupture the illusion of sovereignty.
Backchannels—Tier III protocols—now serve as the scaffolding of stability. These consist of deniable communication events, often mediated through interspecies liaisons trained in psycholinguistic camouflage. The locations of these meetings are untraceable by conventional geography: sub-oceanic enclaves, magnetically nullified orbital corridors, and memory-restricted facilities buried beneath neutral terrain.
The currency of these engagements is not law, but understanding.
The Species Asymmetry Problem
Traditional diplomacy is predicated on shared assumptions: mortality, emotion, geography. Extraterrestrial interlocutors violate each. They appear to operate on non-linear timeframes, lack emotional reciprocity, and express no interest in territorial acquisition. Their incursions are not invasions; they are surveys. Their silence is not absence; it is posture.
This creates an asymmetry more profound than nuclear imbalance. It is an ontological asymmetry. One party negotiates for national interest; the other, perhaps, for observational purity. To frame this in familiar terms: the strategic logic of the Westphalian state collapses in the presence of an intelligence that neither recognizes nor requires it.
Bio-Strategic Threats: The Black Goo Problem
In certain contact scenarios, biogenic materials have been recovered. One such substance, euphemistically labeled “biomorphic substrate 7-B” (publicly mythologized as “black goo”), appears to exhibit self-organizing behavior and latent mimicry protocols. If confirmed, this constitutes a new form of geopolitical threat: asymmetric biogenic incursion.
Unlike nuclear weapons, which obey physics and politics, such entities operate at the intersection of biology and semiotics. Infection is interpretation. The host is not conquered but rewritten. The state, as an organizing principle, is bypassed altogether.

Henry Kissinger - who did not write this piece.
Managing Public Belief: The Last Line of Defense
The final bastion of statecraft is not the military, but narrative control. Leaks are inevitable. Belief is negotiable. Over the last seven decades, a controlled flow of misinformation—from tabloids to prestige media—has served to manage the psychological bandwidth of the population. Irony, ridicule, and selective sensationalism function as antibodies against epistemological trauma.
This is not manipulation. It is governance.
Societies cannot endure truths for which they possess no institutions. Extraterrestrial presence is one such truth. Until a framework for cosmic legitimacy is constructed, disbelief is a civic virtue.
Toward a Strategic Cosmology
The time has come to think beyond terrestrial diplomacy. A strategic cosmology must be forged—a system of assumptions, protocols, and mutual constraints capable of managing not just state actors, but species actors.
Among the preliminary steps:
- Establishment of a UN Office for Non-Human Engagement (secret mandate)
- Codification of extradimensional asylum protocols
- A planetary communication doctrine grounded in ambiguity, plausibility, and delay
Above all, we must preserve the primacy of negotiation over revelation. For while history is shaped by wars, it is sustained by secrets.
To speak plainly: If extraterrestrials must exist, it is imperative that they exist discreetly.
Sidebar: Signs of Tier III Contact (1997–2024)
- Unexplained temporal shifts in surveillance footage around sensitive installations
- Frequency anomalies preceding G7 summits
- Sudden linguistic errors by seasoned diplomats under stress
- Opaque budget lines under “cognitive security”
- The unexplained success rate of meteor intercept missions with no official tracking data
Henry A. Kissinger was U.S. Secretary of State and National Security Advisor. His later years have been devoted to confidential advisory work on interspecies diplomacy, orbital discretion protocols, and mythopoetic containment theory. He firmly believes that the ultimate test of statesmanship is the ability to prevent panic while negotiating with the unimaginable.
Note: This piece of writing is a fictional/parodic homage to the writer cited. It is not authored by the actual author or their estate. No affiliation is implied. Also, the Foreign Affairs magazine cover above is not an official cover. This image is a fictional parody created for satirical purposes. It is not associated with the publication’s rights holders, or any real publication. No endorsement or affiliation is intended or implied.

For ‘Behind the Velvet Curtain,’ Foreign Affairs grants select thinkers access to the unlit corridors of power—the places where policy is whispered, reality is flexible, and history is corrected in real time. These essays assume what cannot be proven, pursue what must not be asked, and confront the world as it is when the cameras are off. From reptilian negotiators in Geneva to deep-lore disclosure management in Langley, from psychotronic treaties to extradimensional quiet diplomacy, the authors navigate a domain where secrecy is currency and belief is a liability. The world stage is not what it seems. These are the memos that slip through.
Leave A Comment